Làm thử Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT · Tiếng Anh · Đề 049

Question 15. Arrange the sentences to make a meaningful paragraph about Marie Curie.
a. Her research on radioactivity was groundbreaking, but it also exposed her to dangerous levels of radiation.
b. Marie Curie is one of the most admired scientists in history.
c. Despite the health risks, she continued her work with immense dedication.
d. Born in Poland, she later moved to France to pursue her scientific studies.
e. She eventually won two Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields, a feat that remains remarkable.

Question 17. Arrange the sentences to make a meaningful paragraph about multiculturalism.
a. This diversity is often most visible in large cities, where people from various backgrounds live and work together.
b. It enriches society by introducing new ideas, traditions, and cuisines.
c. A multicultural world is one where multiple cultures coexist and interact.
d. However, fostering mutual respect and understanding is crucial to prevent social friction.
e. Ultimately, embracing multiculturalism can lead to a more tolerant and dynamic global community.

Having become increasingly concerned about plastic pollution, (18) ____. I had heard about these stores where you could buy products without any packaging, and the concept intrigued me. The shop was filled with large dispensers of grains, nuts, and liquids, (19) ____. The atmosphere was calm and purposeful. You bring your own containers, weigh them before filling, and then pay for the product by weight, (20) ____. This simple process felt revolutionary. While it felt a bit unusual at first, (21) ____. It wasn't just about avoiding a plastic bag; it was about rethinking my consumption habits entirely. It’s a small change in my routine, but one that (22) ____.

Having become increasingly concerned about plastic pollution, (18) ____. I had heard about these stores where you could buy products without any packaging, and the concept intrigued me. The shop was filled with large dispensers of grains, nuts, and liquids, (19) ____. The atmosphere was calm and purposeful. You bring your own containers, weigh them before filling, and then pay for the product by weight, (20) ____. This simple process felt revolutionary. While it felt a bit unusual at first, (21) ____. It wasn't just about avoiding a plastic bag; it was about rethinking my consumption habits entirely. It’s a small change in my routine, but one that (22) ____.

Having become increasingly concerned about plastic pollution, (18) ____. I had heard about these stores where you could buy products without any packaging, and the concept intrigued me. The shop was filled with large dispensers of grains, nuts, and liquids, (19) ____. The atmosphere was calm and purposeful. You bring your own containers, weigh them before filling, and then pay for the product by weight, (20) ____. This simple process felt revolutionary. While it felt a bit unusual at first, (21) ____. It wasn't just about avoiding a plastic bag; it was about rethinking my consumption habits entirely. It’s a small change in my routine, but one that (22) ____.

Having become increasingly concerned about plastic pollution, (18) ____. I had heard about these stores where you could buy products without any packaging, and the concept intrigued me. The shop was filled with large dispensers of grains, nuts, and liquids, (19) ____. The atmosphere was calm and purposeful. You bring your own containers, weigh them before filling, and then pay for the product by weight, (20) ____. This simple process felt revolutionary. While it felt a bit unusual at first, (21) ____. It wasn't just about avoiding a plastic bag; it was about rethinking my consumption habits entirely. It’s a small change in my routine, but one that (22) ____.

Having become increasingly concerned about plastic pollution, (18) ____. I had heard about these stores where you could buy products without any packaging, and the concept intrigued me. The shop was filled with large dispensers of grains, nuts, and liquids, (19) ____. The atmosphere was calm and purposeful. You bring your own containers, weigh them before filling, and then pay for the product by weight, (20) ____. This simple process felt revolutionary. While it felt a bit unusual at first, (21) ____. It wasn't just about avoiding a plastic bag; it was about rethinking my consumption habits entirely. It’s a small change in my routine, but one that (22) ____.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The benefits of urban agriculture are numerous. Firstly, it improves access to fresh, healthy produce, particularly in 'food deserts'—areas with limited access to affordable and nutritious food. By growing food closer to home, urban farms drastically cut down on the transportation required to get produce from field to plate, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Secondly, it fosters a sense of community, as people come together to manage gardens and share their harvest. This can also provide educational opportunities for children and adults to learn about where their food comes from.

However, urban farming is not without its challenges. Space is often the most significant constraint in densely populated cities. Soil contamination with heavy metals and other pollutants can be a serious concern in industrial or formerly industrial areas, requiring farmers to use raised beds or container gardening with clean soil. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining an urban farm requires knowledge, labor, and initial investment, which can be barriers for some communities. Despite these hurdles, innovation is thriving. Techniques like hydroponics (growing plants without soil) and aquaponics (a system combining aquaculture with hydroponics) allow for high-yield farming in small, controlled indoor environments.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.

The concept of a four-day school week, where students attend school for four longer days instead of the traditional five, has been gaining traction in various school districts, particularly in rural areas of the United States. Proponents argue that this alternative schedule can lead to significant financial savings for districts, primarily through reduced operational costs like heating, electricity, and bus transportation. Additionally, it is often touted as a powerful tool for teacher recruitment and retention, offering educators a more attractive work-life balance.

Research on student achievement under a four-day week has yielded mixed results. [I] Some studies report slight improvements in reading scores, while others indicate a noticeable decline in math achievement over time. [II] For instance, some schools might use the fifth day for teacher professional development or student tutoring, potentially offsetting any negative effects of reduced instructional time. [III] Others may leave the day entirely unstructured, which could lead to learning loss, especially for younger or at-risk students. [IV] The structure of the longer school day itself also matters; simply adding time without changing teaching strategies may not be effective.

For families, the four-day school week can be a double-edged sword. While some appreciate the extra day for family time or appointments, many face significant hurdles. The primary concern for many working parents is arranging and affording supervision for their children on the day off. This can be a particular burden for low-income families. Furthermore, for children who rely on school for meals, a three-day weekend means one less day of guaranteed nutrition, a problem that some districts try to solve by sending food home with students.