Tốt nghiệp THPT 2025 · Tiếng Anh · Mã đề 1109

Câu hỏi mẫu

3 câu đầu của đề. Vào phần làm thử để trả lời và biết ngay mình đúng hay sai.

1. Phần thông tin chung

   *Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 10.* We are living through a boom in greenwashing – the strategic use of comforting environmental claims to disguise business-as-usual pollution. Picture a chief executive whose company emits millions of tonnes of CO₂. Genuine decarbonisation would require bruising boardroom discussions, huge capital outlays, and a complete redesign of the firm's model. Far easier is to hire a creative agency to plaster products with labels such as "carbon-neutral" or "net-zero," calming critics, investors, and even eco-conscious children while emissions continue unsolved. This tactic meets consumers at every turn. Airline websites promise guilt-free flights, petrol pumps boast zero-impact fuel, and even supermarket bacon is marketed as net-zero. **[I]** Advertising trickery is ancient, yet today's greenwashing – the practice of deliberately covering ongoing pollution in eco-friendly language – has flourished only recently. The expression surfaced in the 1980s amid oil spills and growing climate science, but the real explosion has come as public anxiety over global heating and biodiversity loss has intensified. Faced with mounting scrutiny, many boards prefer **glossy** PR to structural reform. Such corporate sleight of hand has become so pervasive that regulators in Europe and the United States are scrambling to tighten rules on environmental claims, yet enforcement still lags behind marketing creativity. **[II]** The fossil-fuel sector exemplifies the issue. After decades covertly sowing doubt about climate science, oil and gas giants have grasped that direct denial is reputationally toxic. **They** have therefore swapped their denial tactics for a "green" paint-sprayer, trumpeting token investments in renewables while expanding drilling. Why does this matter? Greenwashing and climate denial share a core objective: to postpone the emission cuts urgently required to avert climate breakdown. **[III]** Whereas denial invites opposition, greenwashing lulls the public into believing problems are already solved. Under this collective illusion, pressure on high-emitting firms evaporates and the radical decisions needed to transform energy, transport, and food systems are delayed indefinitely. **[IV]** Greenwashing thus acts as a soothing lullaby, leading society toward ecological ruin with a tune of comforting half-truths. **Exposing this deception is essential if clichés are to be replaced by real, measurable emission cuts.** *(Adapted from https://www.greenpeace.org.uk)*

   Câu 1

   Đọc hiểu · tẩy xanh (greenwashing)0,25 điểm

   Question 1. According to paragraph 1, genuine decarbonisation ______.

   Ainvolves hiring an expert agency

   Bis overlooked by corporations

   Cphysically injures those involved

   Dis costly and demanding
2. Phần thông tin chung

   *Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 10.* We are living through a boom in greenwashing – the strategic use of comforting environmental claims to disguise business-as-usual pollution. Picture a chief executive whose company emits millions of tonnes of CO₂. Genuine decarbonisation would require bruising boardroom discussions, huge capital outlays, and a complete redesign of the firm's model. Far easier is to hire a creative agency to plaster products with labels such as "carbon-neutral" or "net-zero," calming critics, investors, and even eco-conscious children while emissions continue unsolved. This tactic meets consumers at every turn. Airline websites promise guilt-free flights, petrol pumps boast zero-impact fuel, and even supermarket bacon is marketed as net-zero. **[I]** Advertising trickery is ancient, yet today's greenwashing – the practice of deliberately covering ongoing pollution in eco-friendly language – has flourished only recently. The expression surfaced in the 1980s amid oil spills and growing climate science, but the real explosion has come as public anxiety over global heating and biodiversity loss has intensified. Faced with mounting scrutiny, many boards prefer **glossy** PR to structural reform. Such corporate sleight of hand has become so pervasive that regulators in Europe and the United States are scrambling to tighten rules on environmental claims, yet enforcement still lags behind marketing creativity. **[II]** The fossil-fuel sector exemplifies the issue. After decades covertly sowing doubt about climate science, oil and gas giants have grasped that direct denial is reputationally toxic. **They** have therefore swapped their denial tactics for a "green" paint-sprayer, trumpeting token investments in renewables while expanding drilling. Why does this matter? Greenwashing and climate denial share a core objective: to postpone the emission cuts urgently required to avert climate breakdown. **[III]** Whereas denial invites opposition, greenwashing lulls the public into believing problems are already solved. Under this collective illusion, pressure on high-emitting firms evaporates and the radical decisions needed to transform energy, transport, and food systems are delayed indefinitely. **[IV]** Greenwashing thus acts as a soothing lullaby, leading society toward ecological ruin with a tune of comforting half-truths. **Exposing this deception is essential if clichés are to be replaced by real, measurable emission cuts.** *(Adapted from https://www.greenpeace.org.uk)*

   Câu 2

   Đọc hiểu · tẩy xanh (greenwashing)0,25 điểm

   Question 2. Which of the following best summarises paragraph 1?

   AThe great pressure to soothe environmental claims urges high-emitting corporations to adopt greenwashing wisely.

   BThe exponential growth of greenwashing is attributable to the environmental benefits the strategy brings to major emitters.

   CChief executives' opinions are divided on whether or not genuine decarbonisation should be consistently implemented.

   DLarge-emission enterprises prefer "net-zero" or "carbon-neutral" tags on their offerings over genuine decarbonisation.
3. Phần thông tin chung

   *Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 10.* We are living through a boom in greenwashing – the strategic use of comforting environmental claims to disguise business-as-usual pollution. Picture a chief executive whose company emits millions of tonnes of CO₂. Genuine decarbonisation would require bruising boardroom discussions, huge capital outlays, and a complete redesign of the firm's model. Far easier is to hire a creative agency to plaster products with labels such as "carbon-neutral" or "net-zero," calming critics, investors, and even eco-conscious children while emissions continue unsolved. This tactic meets consumers at every turn. Airline websites promise guilt-free flights, petrol pumps boast zero-impact fuel, and even supermarket bacon is marketed as net-zero. **[I]** Advertising trickery is ancient, yet today's greenwashing – the practice of deliberately covering ongoing pollution in eco-friendly language – has flourished only recently. The expression surfaced in the 1980s amid oil spills and growing climate science, but the real explosion has come as public anxiety over global heating and biodiversity loss has intensified. Faced with mounting scrutiny, many boards prefer **glossy** PR to structural reform. Such corporate sleight of hand has become so pervasive that regulators in Europe and the United States are scrambling to tighten rules on environmental claims, yet enforcement still lags behind marketing creativity. **[II]** The fossil-fuel sector exemplifies the issue. After decades covertly sowing doubt about climate science, oil and gas giants have grasped that direct denial is reputationally toxic. **They** have therefore swapped their denial tactics for a "green" paint-sprayer, trumpeting token investments in renewables while expanding drilling. Why does this matter? Greenwashing and climate denial share a core objective: to postpone the emission cuts urgently required to avert climate breakdown. **[III]** Whereas denial invites opposition, greenwashing lulls the public into believing problems are already solved. Under this collective illusion, pressure on high-emitting firms evaporates and the radical decisions needed to transform energy, transport, and food systems are delayed indefinitely. **[IV]** Greenwashing thus acts as a soothing lullaby, leading society toward ecological ruin with a tune of comforting half-truths. **Exposing this deception is essential if clichés are to be replaced by real, measurable emission cuts.** *(Adapted from https://www.greenpeace.org.uk)*

   Câu 3

   Đọc hiểu · tẩy xanh (greenwashing)0,25 điểm

   Question 3. Which of the following is NOT stated as an example of greenwashed products or services?

   Anet-zero bacon

   Bnon-degradable electronics

   Cguilt-free flights

   Dzero-impact fuel

Nộp bài xong là có đáp án và lời giải chi tiết cho từng câu.