Tốt nghiệp THPT 2026 · Tiếng Anh · Mã đề 1121
Đề thi chính thức kì thi tốt nghiệp THPT năm 2026, môn Tiếng Anh, mã đề 1121. Đề gồm 40 câu trắc nghiệm nhiều phương án, làm trong 50 phút.
Cấu trúc đề thi
- 2 điểm
Đọc hiểu: ghi chép bằng tay và bằng bàn phím
Questions 1–8
- 1,5 điểm
Điền từ vào tờ rơi: Green Hands Campaign
Questions 9–14
- 1,25 điểm
Sắp xếp câu thành đoạn văn, lá thư, hội thoại
Questions 15–19
- 1,5 điểm
Điền từ vào quảng cáo: Summer Part-time Jobs for Undergraduates
Questions 20–25
- 2,5 điểm
Đọc hiểu: chi phí cơ hội của dịch vụ môi trường
Questions 26–35
- 1,25 điểm
Điền cụm từ, mệnh đề vào đoạn văn: Psychology of Money
Questions 36–40
Câu hỏi mẫu
3 câu đầu của đề. Vào phần làm thử để trả lời và biết ngay mình đúng hay sai.
Phần thông tin chung
*Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 8.* For decades, students have been convinced that academic success is largely dependent upon meticulous notetaking. What has changed in recent years is not the importance of the practice but the tools used to perform it. The keyboard has subtly supplanted the pen, and with it, the nature of how information is recorded during a lecture has shifted unbeknownst to students. Researchers in cognitive psychology have begun to examine what this change has cost learners. In a series of comparative studies, students taking notes by hand consistently outperformed **those** using laptops on questions that demanded conceptual understanding, even when both groups had access to the same material. **The reason, according to the researchers, lies less in the technology itself than in what each method asks of the brain.** Typing rewards speed; handwriting forces selection. The act of writing by hand is slower, and that slowness appears to be its hidden virtue. Unable to capture every word, students are obliged to listen, decide what matters and condense ideas into their own phrasing. This continuous filtering, referred to as encoding by psychologists, turns out to be **instrumental** in aiding long-term recall. One lecturer summarised the striking contrast after reviewing her students' work: the laptops, she said, had produced transcripts, while the notebooks had produced understanding. It would be misleading, of course, to claim that handwriting is inherently superior or that all keyboards undermine learning. Hard-working typists can summarise, while **indolent** writers can drift. What the research highlights is not a conclusion on devices but a question about effort: which tool, in a given context, asks more of the learner. As a ban on students' use of laptops in classrooms remains a bone of contention among tertiary institutions, the deeper challenge may be helping students recognise that what feels easier in the moment is not always what serves them best afterwards. *(Adapted from https://www.brookings.edu)*Câu 1Đọc hiểu · mục đích đoạn văn0,25 điểmQuestion 1. In paragraph 1, the writer is _____.
promoting the use of technology in recording lecturesquestioning the significance of notetaking in educationchallenging a long-held assumption about academic successintroducing a recent change in the way students take notesPhần thông tin chung
*Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 8.* For decades, students have been convinced that academic success is largely dependent upon meticulous notetaking. What has changed in recent years is not the importance of the practice but the tools used to perform it. The keyboard has subtly supplanted the pen, and with it, the nature of how information is recorded during a lecture has shifted unbeknownst to students. Researchers in cognitive psychology have begun to examine what this change has cost learners. In a series of comparative studies, students taking notes by hand consistently outperformed **those** using laptops on questions that demanded conceptual understanding, even when both groups had access to the same material. **The reason, according to the researchers, lies less in the technology itself than in what each method asks of the brain.** Typing rewards speed; handwriting forces selection. The act of writing by hand is slower, and that slowness appears to be its hidden virtue. Unable to capture every word, students are obliged to listen, decide what matters and condense ideas into their own phrasing. This continuous filtering, referred to as encoding by psychologists, turns out to be **instrumental** in aiding long-term recall. One lecturer summarised the striking contrast after reviewing her students' work: the laptops, she said, had produced transcripts, while the notebooks had produced understanding. It would be misleading, of course, to claim that handwriting is inherently superior or that all keyboards undermine learning. Hard-working typists can summarise, while **indolent** writers can drift. What the research highlights is not a conclusion on devices but a question about effort: which tool, in a given context, asks more of the learner. As a ban on students' use of laptops in classrooms remains a bone of contention among tertiary institutions, the deeper challenge may be helping students recognise that what feels easier in the moment is not always what serves them best afterwards. *(Adapted from https://www.brookings.edu)*Câu 2Đọc hiểu · quy chiếu0,25 điểmQuestion 2. The word those in paragraph 2 refers to _____.
researchersnotesstudentsstudiesPhần thông tin chung
*Read the passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 8.* For decades, students have been convinced that academic success is largely dependent upon meticulous notetaking. What has changed in recent years is not the importance of the practice but the tools used to perform it. The keyboard has subtly supplanted the pen, and with it, the nature of how information is recorded during a lecture has shifted unbeknownst to students. Researchers in cognitive psychology have begun to examine what this change has cost learners. In a series of comparative studies, students taking notes by hand consistently outperformed **those** using laptops on questions that demanded conceptual understanding, even when both groups had access to the same material. **The reason, according to the researchers, lies less in the technology itself than in what each method asks of the brain.** Typing rewards speed; handwriting forces selection. The act of writing by hand is slower, and that slowness appears to be its hidden virtue. Unable to capture every word, students are obliged to listen, decide what matters and condense ideas into their own phrasing. This continuous filtering, referred to as encoding by psychologists, turns out to be **instrumental** in aiding long-term recall. One lecturer summarised the striking contrast after reviewing her students' work: the laptops, she said, had produced transcripts, while the notebooks had produced understanding. It would be misleading, of course, to claim that handwriting is inherently superior or that all keyboards undermine learning. Hard-working typists can summarise, while **indolent** writers can drift. What the research highlights is not a conclusion on devices but a question about effort: which tool, in a given context, asks more of the learner. As a ban on students' use of laptops in classrooms remains a bone of contention among tertiary institutions, the deeper challenge may be helping students recognise that what feels easier in the moment is not always what serves them best afterwards. *(Adapted from https://www.brookings.edu)*Câu 3Đọc hiểu · diễn đạt lại câu0,25 điểmQuestion 3. Which of the following best paraphrases the underlined sentence in paragraph 2?
Regardless of the method of notetaking, the effects on the brain exhibit little difference as long as technology is involved in student performance.The difference in student performance is attributable to the modern technology instead of the mental work that each method of notetaking requires.What explains the difference in student performance is the mental work that each method of notetaking demands, rather than the technology.The modern device, along with the mental requirements of each method for the brain, is responsible for the difference in student performance.
Nộp bài xong là có đáp án và lời giải chi tiết cho từng câu.